“They are all acting contrary to the decrees of the emperor, saying that there is another king named Jesus (Acts 17:7b). Jesus is King. Do we realize that political leaders can displace Jesus as King?
I have a friend who contributed to Ben Carson’s presidential campaign. I have a friend who voted for Donald Trump. I have a friend who backed Bernie Sanders. I have a friend who campaigned for Marco Rubio. I have a friend still upset by Huckabee’s dropping out of the race. I have a friend with a Hillary Clinton bumper sticker still on her car. How are all these people my friends? Our bond as family in Christ supersedes our political positions. According to Pew, Churches of Christ are 50% Republican, 39% Democrat, and 11% Independent. I’m so thankful Jesus makes us ONE in God’s kingdom!
The recent election cycle seemed especially negative. I know historians can point to other elections where candidates were more vicious in their attacks and the press more negative in their coverage. But to me, it seems every time I heard anything about the election it involved candidates (or their surrogates) attacking each other and pointing out all the things wrong with our nation.
One candidate would spew about what was wrong from his or her perspective. Then the other candidate would spout about what was wrong from his or her perspective. And after all the speeches and advertisements and interviews were over, chances are what sticks in your mind is what was wrong from every point of view.
And you begin to wonder if anything is good. Is there anything positive about our country?
Yesterday I experienced a refreshing reminder of one the positives about my nation and my community. We checked into the doctor’s office for an appointment. The first person we encountered on entering the building was a white male who in doing a great job helping people find their way in the massive building was overcoming a “disability” with every step. The receptionist was a self-proclaimed “country girl” who had moved to the city several years ago. The worker taking vital signs was a beautifully dark-skinned immigrant from Africa. The resident who was working with the primary physician was a beautifully pale-skinned woman with Scandinavian roots.
As we left the building I couldn’t help but think about how wonderful it is to live in a country and in a community where such diversity exists. The politicians do a great job of pointing out all that is wrong. Those people I encountered at the doctor’s office did a great job of pointing out something that is right and good.
How beautiful it is to see people from diverse backgrounds cooperatively working together.
In the 1990’s limits on tax-deductions known as PEP and Pease were part of a budget deal. Specifically, they limited the percentage of charitable giving and other deductions that could be itemized on your tax return. PEP and Pease were in effect for a decade before being eliminated in 2001 tax cuts.
With the “fiscal cliff” deal, Pease is back in 2013, at least for higher income people. So if you make $250,000 per year (singles) or $300,000 (married couples) there will be a cap on how much of your charitable giving can be itemized and deducted on your tax return. Here is a quick explanation and example of how it works.
…the Pease limitation reduces a household’s itemized deductions by 3% of the amount over the threshold. The reduction can’t exceed 80% of the total deductions.
A couple with income of $400,000 average about $50,000 in itemized deductions, according to IRS statistics. Because their income would exceed the $300,000 threshold by $100,000, their allowed deductions would be reduced by about $3,000 to $47,000—potentially boosting their tax bill by about $1,000.
(from Deduction Limits Will Affect Many by John D. McKinnon in The Wall Street Journal, January 2, 2013).
The return of Pease will give some opportunity to rail against tax increases. Others will give thanks that taxes have increased, especially on people many consider wealthy. Still others will fret about the effect Pease might have on charitable giving. Some may even vow to stop their charitable giving. While I have little interest in the politics of all this, I am very interested in people of faith taking opportunity to examine our motivation for giving, particularly to church, but other charitable giving as well.
Back in the 80’s a friend of mine named Dennis told me that he did not itemize his church contributions. He explained that he did not feel right about benefiting from what he was giving to God. We looked at passages like Malachi 1 in which the prophet rebuked the people of God for giving God blemished sacrifices. Dennis asked, “What kind of ‘giving’ is it when we give God what costs us nothing?” After we finished our conversation, Dennis decided the best approach would be to itemize his church contributions, calculate how much that deduction benefited him, and donate the refund amount generated by the itemized deduction. I appreciate his intentions.
So as political rhetoric rages, I want to encourage people of God to give their first fruits to God as they have been prospered, give generously to those in need, and to do it all to worship Almighty God, not for a tax break.
Election Day — November 12, 2012 — is fast approaching.
Some members of our church family feel that this day is important and voting is an essential exercise. Others in our church family feel this day is irrelevant and voting an exercise in futility.
Some members of our church family cannot wait to cast their vote to re-elect President Obama. Others in our church family cannot wait to vote for Governor Romney. Still others in our church family do not like either candidate and so will vote for another candidate or refrain from voting in the presidential election. And still others will vote for “anybody but Obama” or “anybody but Romney.”
Some members of our church family will enjoy every minute of this election cycle. They will attend rallies, watch and listen to commercials, talk back to the television during debates, and be enthralled with the entire experience. Others in our church family are dreading the whole experience — the debates, the television and radio political ads, the blog posts, and status updates.
At some point in the days leading up to November 12 the debate will turn nasty, the ads will go negative, the name-calling will become demonization, and some pundits and other talking heads will call for civility in the public discourse.
What role should Christians play in all this? Let me make it clear that I am not talking about what candidate Christians should back. Again, as I stated above, Christians — including those at Lafayette– are all over the map on political affiliation and candidates. I am talking about the role Christians can and should play when it comes to civility.
Christians should lead the way in promoting civility. In fact, Christians should not be satisfied with civility. Our standard should be even higher — the golden rule, for example. Perhaps the standard should even be love, kindness, and compassion.
So if you are interested in the election — whether you are red or blue; R, D, or I; voting for Obama, Romney or a third party candidate — don’t settle for civility. Go beyond civility. Watch your words and your tone. Be careful not to personalize issues and demonize candidates or their supporters. Think twice before you pass on an email, tweet, or status update that is filled with angry rhetoric and information and accusations that might not even be true.
What would it be like if Christians took the lead in setting the tone for public discourse by going beyond civility to love, kindness, and the golden rule?
Dedicated to my friends who believe Obama is the Messiah and those who believe we are doomed if he is elected.
While I rarely post about political topics, this week I wanted to post a couple of stories that have caught my attention as the election draws near.
I recently read an article in The Washington Post about Cindy McCain, the wife of Republican Presidential hopeful John McCain. The article focused on her quiet humanitarian efforts that I never knew about until I read this piece by Michael Gershon.
Here’s how the article begins —
KIGALI, Rwanda — Cindy McCain’s first visit to this country, in 1994, was during the high season of roadblocks and machetes and shallow graves.
Following a call for help from Doctors Without Borders, McCain had assembled a medical team with the intention of setting up a mobile hospital in Rwanda. Arriving by private plane in mid-April, a couple of weeks into the massacres, she realized that the chaos made deploying her team impossible. At the airport, she paid for the use of a truck and set out for Goma in then-Zaire, where hundreds of thousands of refugees were also headed.
It is rare for me to blog about anything political. In May I did include a post about John McCain’s quiet approach to his faith which linked an article in The Los Angeles Times entitled McCain doesn’t put his faith out front. The article points out McCain’s religious upbringing, convictions, and even tells of his being a chaplain to fellow prisoners when a POW, while stressing that he does not grandstanding with his faith.
While it’s rare for me to post about politics, I do want to share a couple more stories this week. Please don’t take these posts as me trying to endorse a candidate, I just want to share some things that have caught my attention, particularly when faith and politics intersect.
First, I want to share with you Donald Miller’s prayer at the Democratic National Convention. I have enjoyed Miller’s writings and was moved by his prayer. Here’s the video:
You can read the article by clicking here.